Thursday, 5 January 2017

Does ultrasound ever feel non-subjective??



If your ultrasound journey has begun you may have frequent headaches!

Ultrasound can be very subjective! Protocol is important to prevent that ominous feeling that your image series does not make sense. Subjective findings can cause one to lose focus on the study at hand and there are few things worse for a new sono than not knowing where to begin, continue or end a study.

I performed a foot exam today on a middle-aged woman with pain radiating from forefoot into her toes. Pain was elucidated somewhere in the region of the 2-4 MT heads. I have struggled to visualise interdigital neuroma. I want to share my strategy.

My protocol has been to :-

1. Dorsal foot- image each MTP jt in long to assess for ganglion/s, jt effusion , bony abnormality and simple assessment of the extensor tendons. Foot is flat down on table.

2. Dorsal assessment in longitudinal section - assess each webspace with leg straight and foot slightly dorsiflexed . Push the thumb of the non-transducer hand in to the plantar webspace while assessing dorsally to attempt visualisation of a morton's neuroma ( hypoechoic, heterogenous, oval, non-compressible perineural fibrosis), intermetatarsal bursitis (compressible).

3. Plantar foot- transducer in short axis in a coronal scan plane between metatarsal heads . Assess each webspace with dorsal compression. Label each MT head. Once again we are looking for that non-compressible hypoechoic and oval lesion between the MT heads, intermet bursitis and adventitial bursitis. Hopefully we can pop it out with compression to visualise well. The patient can assist in conveying any elucidated pain or discomfort.

4. Plantar foot - assess each webspace in long section . Again with the dorsal compression.


5. Plantar foot- assess each plantar plate and flexor tendon


Image result for plantar plate ultrasound

Image courtesy http://radiologykey.com/disorders-of-the-ankle-and-foot-forefoot/

Practice makes perfect. Protocol preparation means that you can focus on obtaining images and hopefully picking up pathology rather than trying to figure out how to best image and document your images.


On a different note just to finish:

A great sono told me when dealing with general masses take 3 trans, 3 long , 3 colour! Ensure your field of view is deep enough to assess the mass in relation to neighboring structures

FOR EXAMPLE - today I performed a groin US on a man 5 weeks post melanoma removal from ankle. Several lymph nodes were removed from the ankle, popliteal fossa and groin. Immediately deep to the groin scar was a hypoechoic nodule I felt was a round and unhappy lymph node with loss of focal fatty hilum. There were adjacent prominent nodes with focal fatty hila. Patient had tenderness and noticed 5 days prior.

The CFA and CFV are immediately deep to the lesion. Note the increased depth offers perspective. Differential now includes a slow leak false aneurysm. There were some linear striations within the lesion which may indicate clotting. There was no internal colour flow or spectral doppler flow.


Monday, 2 January 2017

A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step....

If you are reading this blog you are probably contemplating or training in ultrasound. Welcome!

I am an advanced beginner in ultrasound so forgive me if I gloss over basic foundations from time to time. I wanted to share my thoughts and experiences so that you may take comfort in realising your difficulties and struggles are shared.

I will jump straight into content today. When writing a report post examination it is critical to describe pathology in a logical sequence covering all aspects of that " thing " you saw. Sometimes you will know what it is and other times you may be baffled . Description is vital in conveying your message.

What is important?

1. Echogenicity- anechoic , hypoechoic, hyperechoic

2. Echotexture - smooth or rough ( homogenous, heterogenous)

3. Size often in 3 dimensions

4. Shape - assess borders ? oval, round , angular borders etc.

5. Compressibility

6. Mobility

7. Vascularity? Assess with colour , power and / or spectral doppler . Is the vascularity peripheral or central to the lesion?

8. Is there pain or tenderness over the region of interest ? Vital

9. Can the region be compared to the contra lateral side? If so compare and contrast.

10. Location relative to fixed anatomic landmarks  if a mass under skin eg. bony landmarks

11. Posterior enhancement or shadow?

Think about how you will describe your pathology during the live scan. A radiologist relies on good communication with a sono.

 I apologise if I have missed anything and if you can think of anything else please email.